Christopher Hitchens and prayer

There are an extrordinary amount of articles and blogs out there by people who are bothered by what Christopher Hitchens will do now that he has cancer and, now that there is a strong chance he will die (though, as he rightly says himself we are all dying, with him it has been accelerated). 

These aren’t necessarily religious people and writers, but they are all either concerned about what Hitchens will think or re-think on God, or are surprised that he has said he won’t be praying – surely it should drive some of these people to distraction just contemplating the unlikely event that Hitchens would turn to God; how stupid a reason for believing in God than being reminded of your own mortality.

Strikes me at first glance at being even more stupider than Pascal’s Wager.

Some examples are:

Christopher Hitchens tells The Atlantic magazine that he knows he’s dying, but still views all religion as manmade and all of its claims to divine revelation as false.

WTOL in Ohio

A month ago, the conservative Catholic writer challenged readers of the American Papist website to join him in praying one Hail Mary a day on behalf of the iconoclastic atheist Christopher Hitchens, who has been stricken with esophageal cancer, a disease that leaves few survivors.

Terry Mattingly for North West Arkansas Online

Nearly two months after being diagnosed with cancer and undergoing chemotherapy, famed atheist Christopher Hitchens has lost much of his hair but his unbelief remains intact.

Nathan Black for the Christian Post

He said that as for a deathbed conversion, he would not, while lucid, do ”such a pathetic thing”, and that if there are any rumours saying otherwise, ”don’t believe it”.

Matt Buchanan and Leesha McKenny for The Sydney Morning Herald

That won’t change while he continues to undergo difficult cancer treatments nor will his belief that praying won’t help him a lick. At least he is consistent.

Paula Duffy for Huliq news

Hitchens elsewhere has noted a “lets paray for Hitchens” day which will take place on the 20th of September, though says he will not take part.

Now I’m not religious, and I’m not strident in my atheism as Hitchens, nor am I as anti-thesitic as him, which he regards more important than atheism in itself. But I would question the intergrity of someone who throughout their career has professed a deep and thought out dislike for religion, but then on finding out they have a potentially life threatening illness, decides to say “well, i’ll give that God a go now”.

Like the wager appropriated by Pascal in the 1600’s, God if he had any dignity should say “sod off, you’re only doing this in case”; either that or forgive those who don’t believe on the grounds that ockham’s razor is demonstrably an easier tool to muck around with than blind faith.

For those who think cancer is an appropriate occasion for conversion, perhaps they would prefer to concentrate their attention on President Fernando Lugo of Paraguay. For the second time a tumor has been detected in his thorax, between the lungs and the spinal column and like with Hitchens it will affect his lymph nodes.

The difference is, Lugo is the self-confessed “Bishop of the Poor”, a former Roman Catholic priest for 30 years. I don’t suppose they would want him to have a cancer conversion.

I shouldn’t like to be so strident (ever), but I will be for this reason: for those of us who don’t think religion is simply stupid, it is often quite a task to convince people who do, that religion doesn’t just pick on the vulnerable. With trying to encourage conversions for those with cancer, on their deathbed, or with any other illnesses, this doesn’t help my task out much.

So retire – and make the 20th of September just another day.

Advertisements

5 Responses to Christopher Hitchens and prayer

  1. Chris Lamb says:

    Erm… Missed the point much?

    I’m not a journalist/blogger but if I’d wrote an article like yours I would have least taken the time to watch one of the few interviews with Hitchens since his diagnosis.

    In it he clearly states that while he can and will never believe in God but (as any thinking person might do) he appreciates the sentiment of those who would pray on his behalf, especially as he disagrees with them so vehemently. He says that of course prayer doesn’t actually do anything to help but is relatively harmless and so “If it makes YOU feel better, do it, but I won’t be taking part”.

    And you portray him here as some sort of intellectual coward.

    I’m not sure how one could be any more unequivocal but perhaps your blind faith has also made you deaf and dumb?

    • I’m glad you wrote because I was worried all the twats had left for summer school.

      If I could correct you in a few places: I don’t much care what he thinks about those who are praying for him, despite having watched a few of the videos with him in the last few weeks, including the one with him and Amis for the Atlantic.

      He’s not an intellectual coward, no do I portray him as one; I don’t even know where that came from. I disagree with him on many things, but no coward is he.

      I have no faith, be that blind or any other. I suspect you haven’t read the article.

      Don’t come back here, go and read Iain Dale’s blog where you can comment not having read any of the articles he has to offer there.

      • Chris Lamb says:

        “Hitchens elsewhere has noted a “lets pray for Hitchens” day which will take place on the 20th of September, though says he will not take part.

        Now I’m not religious, and I’m not strident in my atheism as Hitchens, nor am I as anti-thesitic as him, which he regards more important than atheism in itself. But I would question the intergrity of someone who throughout their career has professed a deep and thought out dislike for religion, but then on finding out they have a potentially life threatening illness, decides to say “well, i’ll give that God a go now”.

        Based on your response I assume I WAS in fact mistaken (sorry) and you were attacking this obsession with his possible death-bed conversion or lack thereof but really, it wasn’t very clear. I can now see what you intended to say was much more banal.

      • banal I can handle. But I’m hardly surprised at being misread by someone like yourself

  2. Pingback: More catching up « Poumista

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: